Skip to content

Videolaryngoscopy versus videostylet for laryngectomy intubation

Videolaryngoscopy versus videostylet for laryngectomy intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2300068449
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-02-20
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pharyngeal cancer

Interventions

Videolaryngoscopy (VL) group:The first tracheal intubation was performed using a videolaryngoscope
Videostylet (VS) group:The first tracheal intubation was performed using a videostylet

Sponsors

Eye&ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults (>= 18 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who were scheduled for elective otolaryngologic surgery under general anesthesia with planned orotracheal intubation (either could be intubated under VL and VS) were eligible if difficult post-induction intubation attributable to a laryngeal tumor was anticipated; Informed consent was obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: With cardiopulmonary arrest, emergency airway, risk for aspiration, difficulty in mask ventilation, BMI > 40kg/m^2, thyreomental distance < 6cm, interincisal opening < 3cm, predicted for awake intubation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the first-attempt success rate of intubation;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
intubation time;incidence of airway complications;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHan yuan

Eye&ENT Hospital of Fudan University

hanyuan@fdeent.org+86 138 5247 0693

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026