Skip to content

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality with Fewer Side Effects Compared with Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: the Safety and Efficacy of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique in Cesarean Section: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality with Fewer Side Effects Compared with Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: the Safety and Efficacy of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique in Cesarean Section: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200063404
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-09-06
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supine position syndrome after intraspinal anesthesia

Interventions

Combined spinal and epidural block anesthesia:After the epidural space was clearly reached, the dura was punctured with a 25 G lumbar needle and the subarachnoid space was clearly reached. Clear cereb
Epidural anesthesia group:When the epidural space is clearly reached, an epidural catheter is placed in the epidural space with the opening end pointing cephalic. Routine epidural anesthesia was perfo
dural puncture epidural group:After the epidural space was clearly reached, the spinal cord was punctured with a 25-g lumbar anesthesia needle. When the cerebrospinal fluid was seen to flow out, the s

Sponsors

The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Cesarean section was evaluated by obstetricians and anesthesiologists, and there were no contraindications of spinal block; 2. ASA grade I-II; 3. Aged 20-45 years; 4. 18 kg/m2 < BMI < 30 kg/m2 ; 5. Clearly understand, voluntarily participate in the study, and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe pregnancy complications; 2.Complications of pregnancy; 3. Abnormal fetal position; 4. Multiple pregnancies; 5. Have serious other underlying diseases; 6. Persons dependent on alcohol or opioids; 7. Transfer to cesarean section for painless delivery; 8. Not suitable for intraspinal anesthesia; 9. Patients deemed ineligible for this trial by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total amount of local anesthetic;adverse reaction;

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Onset time of anesthesia;block level;Lower extremity motor block;Sacrococcygeal nerve block;Lower limb movement recovery time;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChen Juan

The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China

327641391@qq.com+86 13973167744

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026