Skip to content

Comparison of clinical efficacy between dry needling therapy and transversus abdominis plane block in the treatment of chronic abdominal wall pain

Trigger point dry needling versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in the treatment of chronic abdominal wall pain: A single-center, randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200062931
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-08-24
Start date
2022-08-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic abdominal wall pain

Interventions

control group:Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block
trial group:Trigger point dry needling

Sponsors

Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years old 50% reduction after diagnostic trigger point infiltration with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Abdominal surgery within the past 6 months; 2. History of abdominal and pelvis visceral disease; 3. Thoracic neuropathy; 4. History of cancer-related pain; 5. Abnormal laboratory examination or abdominal imaging; 6. History of schizophrenia, other chronic psychotic disorder, or dementing illness; 7. Body mass index (BMI) less than 18.5 or greater than 28kg/m2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Numerical Rating Scale;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Anxiety and Depression Scale Score;SF-36 Scale;Dosage and frequency of remedial drugs;Temperature change in pain area;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYan Yuan
1046112@qq.com+86 18052268635

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026