Skip to content

Comparison of microchannel microscopy discectomy and foraminal microscopy discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of microchannel microscopy discectomy and foraminal microscopy discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200061494
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-06-27
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar disc herniation

Interventions

Experimental group:Microchannel microscopic discectomy via paravertebral approach
Control group:Spinal endoscopic discectomy via interforaminal approach

Sponsors

Union Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18-70 years; 2. There are obvious symptoms of back and leg pain, which are ineffective after conservative treatment for more than 3 months; 3. The affected side straight leg elevation test is less than 50 degrees; 4. MRI and CT confirmed that L3/4, L4/5 or L5/S1 posterolateral lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in all patients, and the location of herniation was consistent with the corresponding neurological symptoms; 5. Lumbar radiographs (anteroposterior and lateral, double oblique, hyperextension and hyperflexion) showed no segmental lumbar instability; 6. Informed consent of patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating patients, screening for ß-HCG is high; 2. Patients with a history of surgery in lumbar vertebrae; 3. Cauda equina syndrome; 4. Spondylolisthesis or degenerative spondylolisthesis; 5. Central-type and lateral recessed spinal stenosis; 6. Patients who cannot follow the follow-up required by the protocol, or who are considered by the investigator to be at increased risk of participating in the study; 7. Unable to provide written informed consent, or unable to follow the test protocol; 8. The expected survival time is less than 1 year; 9. Immigrants or those with language and communication disabilities who plan to migrate within one year; 10. Other serious physical or mental diseases that are not suitable for surgery; 11. Patients in other clinical trials; 12. Patients with rheumatic immune diseases that may cause similar symptoms; 13. MRI, CT enhancement and other special examinations are not suitable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oswestry disable index;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analogue scale;Japanese orthopaedic association low back pain score;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhang Qiusheng

Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

shinezqs@163.com+86 13392803629

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026