Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine and propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine and propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200061468
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-06-25
Start date
2022-06-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pancreaticobiliary pathologies

Interventions

DEX group :dexmedetomidine
PRO group:propofol

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged between 18 to 80 years; 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) I to III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous allergy to midazolam/Sufentanil/dexmedetomidine/propofol; 2. Pregnant patients; 3. The patient refused to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
sedation-related adverse events;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ramsay sedation score;bispectral index of EEG;oxygen saturation;mean arterial pressure;respiratory rate;heart rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWang Junlu
wangjunlu973@163.com+86 13806689854

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026