Skip to content

Comparison of efficacy and safety between robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver caudate lobectomy

Comparison of efficacy and safety between robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver caudate lobectomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200058360
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-04-07
Start date
2022-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver disease

Interventions

laparoscopic caudate lobe liver resection:robotic assisted caudate lobe liver resection

Sponsors

Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with liver diseases who have received robot assisted and laparoscopic caudate lobectomy for continuous time; 2. The patient visited Run Run Shaw Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University Medical College; 3. The operation date shall be before March 20, 2022.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Resection of caudate lobe combined with left and right liver; 2. Resection of liver and other organs or other operations (except biliary intestinal anastomosis); 3. Patients with incomplete clinical data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative complications;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative hospital stay;Estimated operation time;Blood loss;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiao Liang

Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

srrshlx@zju.edu.cn+86 13588708506

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026