Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two different modes of microfocusing ultrasound in the treatment of lower and middle face relaxation

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two different modes of microfocusing ultrasound in the treatment of lower and middle face relaxation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200056198
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-02-01
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flabby lower face

Interventions

treatment group :large focal field ultrasound system
control group :general ultrasound scalpel system

Sponsors

Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Typical facial symmetry lesions; 2.Fitzpatrick skin type III–IV ; 3.The age of 35 to 60 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant women, those who are breast-feeding, and those whose age is less than 35 years old; 2. Patients with vitiligo and keloid constitution in advanced stage (with a history of hypertrophic scar or keloid), and patients with connective tissue disease; 3. Previous history of photodermatosis and photoinduced epilepsy; 4. The skin lesion has been treated with laser or optical equipment within 3 months; 5. Take anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs and retinoic acid drugs within 6 months; 6. Taking immunosuppressive drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ANTERA 3D;Photo;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Satisfaction rating;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhenfeng Liu

Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University

liuzhenfengpuma@163.com+86 18011788797

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026