FindTrial
Sign In

Difference Between Actual Needle Depth and Ultrasound Estimated Depth Correlated the Success Rate of Spinal Needle Insertion During Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Obstetric Parturients

Difference Between Actual Needle Depth and Ultrasound Estimated Depth Correlated the Success Rate of Spinal Needle Insertion During Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Obstetric Parturients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200055987
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-01-30
Start date
2022-01-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean section

Interventions

Case series:none

Sponsors

Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Obstetric patients under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia; 2. Spinal ultrasound was used to determine the depth of epidural space.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients refuse to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference Between Actual Needle Depth and Ultrasound Estimated Depth;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Success or fail of CSEA;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactTao Bingdong

Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

taobd@icloud.com+86 18940255594

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026