FindTrial
Sign In

Eit-directed PEEP Settings versus traditional PEEP Settings in patients without ARDS

Eit-directed PEEP Settings versus traditional PEEP Settings in patients without ARDS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2200055967
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-01-30
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

non-ARDS

Interventions

Experimental group:Eit-directed PEEP Settings
Control group:The conventional recommended PEEP value of 5cmH2O was used for mechanical ventilation

Sponsors

Shandong Provincial Public Health Clinical Center(Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who were newly admitted to ICU and underwent endotracheal intubation or endotracheal intubation before admission but mechanical ventilation time < 24 hours (2022.02.01-2022.08.31).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ARDS; 2. Age 24 hours prior to admission; 5. COPD class III/IV; 6. Pneumothorax; 7. Restrictive lung disease; 8. Severely elevated intracranial pressure; 9. Severe hemodynamic disorders; 10. Severe untreatable anemia; 11. Patients with implanted pacemaker; 12. Patients receiving ECMO.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ventilation distribution;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of atelectasis;incidence of VAP;oxygenation;ventilation days;mortality;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLvy Bao

Shandong Provincial Public Health Clinical Center(Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital)

northof@163.com+86 15168860170

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026