Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two different modes of microfocusing ultrasound in the treatment of lower and middle face relaxation

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two different modes of microfocusing ultrasound in the treatment of lower and middle face relaxation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100053948
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-12-04
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial rejuvenation

Interventions

Experimental group:large focal field ultrasound system
Control group:general ultrasound scalpel system

Sponsors

Southern Medical University Dermatology Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Typical facial symmetrical skin lesions; 2. Fitzpatrick skin classification III-IV; 3. Aged 35 to 60 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, age <35 years old; 2. Patients with advanced vitiligo, scar constitution (with a history of hypertrophic scar or keloid), and connective tissue disease; 3. History of photodermatosis and photoinduced epilepsy in the past; 4. The skin lesions have been treated with laser or optical equipment within 3 months; 5. Take anticoagulant drugs, antiplatelet drugs, and tretinoin drugs within 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VISIA photo;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Satisfaction rating;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLiu Zhenfeng

Southern Medical University Dermatology Hospital

liuzhenfengpuma@163.com+86 18011788797

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026