Comparative study on different intubation techniques of left double-lumen tube

A comparative study of different intubation techniques in a left double-lumen tube: a randomized controlled trial

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2100053348

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-11-19

Start date

2021-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung tumor

Interventions

Group 1:The intubation is rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise in the middle of the head

Group 2:Rotate the tube 180 degrees counterclockwise with the head tilted to the right

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients proposed to undergo lobectomy with left dual luminal bronchial intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Mallapati grading > GRADE II or Cormach-Lehane grading > Grade 2 under ordinary laryngoscopy; 2. Patients requiring intubation by means of exposure other than direct laryngoscopy or visual laryngoscopy; 3. Patients with dual-chamber intubation type < 35 Fr; 4. Patients with intraluminal lesions of the main airway; 5. Patients with a history of cervical spine or limited range of motion.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Success rate of initial intubation;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Recovery intubation success rate;Intubation complication;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactQuan Xiang

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

quan79102@188.com+86 13683658102

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026