Reversed manual dissection in prepareing donor laellar grafts

Comparing the clinical efficacy between reversed manual dissection and conventional manual dissection

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2100052679

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-11-03

Start date

2021-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

keratopathy

Interventions

Control group:Lamellar keratoplasty using conventional manually dissected grafts

Experimental group:Lamellar keratoplasty using reversed manually dissected grafts

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

10 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with various corneal diseases requiring lamellar keratoplasty.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with corneal perforation or who failed lamellar keratoplasty to undergo penetrating keratoplasty; 2. A history of corneal transplantation; 3. Connective tissue disease, severe dry eye; 4. Failure to cooperate with long-term follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
visual acuity;corneal thickness;corneal transparency;corneal densitometry;corneal curvature;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
intraocular pressure;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactBi Yanlong

Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University

biyanlong@tongji.edu.cn+86 13816261568

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026