Comparative study on the effect of closed suction and traditional suction in patients with artificial airways

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2100051892

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-10-09

Start date

2021-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

artificial airway patients

Interventions

Experimental group:closed suction

Control group:traditional suction

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The types of antibiotic drug intake are basically the same; 2. Artificial airway management is required for all inspection results at the time of admission inspection; 3. No history of serious infection and major lung disease; 4. Signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 2. GCS score <= 3 points; 3. Patients with severe viscous sputum on admission; 4. Patients with unconsciousness or deep coma.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Thickness of sputum sample;Artificial airway indwelling time;Complication rate;Heart rate;Blood oxygen saturation;Systolic blood pressure;Risk ratio;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Sputum suction effect;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactBi Yumiao

Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital

602450436@qq.com+86 23 67063949

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026