FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the treatment effect of two different types of oral appliances in pediatric OSA patients

Comparisons of the Effects of Two Types of Oral Appliances on Respiratory Parameters and Upper Airway Dimensions in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100051538
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-09-26
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pediatric obstructive sleep apnea

Interventions

Group patients treated with Twin-block:Twin-block device
Group patients treated with clear aligner:clear aligner

Sponsors

Shandong Stomatological Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
7 Years to 14 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients aged 7-14 years; 2.Able to follow-up; 3.Diagnosed with as OSA patients; 4.Patients without hypertrophy of the tonsils or adenoids; 5.Patients with constricted dental arch or mandibular retraction (A point, nasion, B point (ANB>5).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Untreated caries, pulpitis; 2. Medication history related to sleep; 3. Other respiratory/sleep disorders other than OSA; 4. Systemic diseases (eg, systemic arthritis, etc.); 5. Abnormal temporomandibular joint; 6. Medical history, such as mental retardation, memory disturbance, or mental illness; 7. The included subjects have kinship.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
change of apnea-hypopnea index;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
change of upper airway measurements;change of muscle activity;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChen Hui

School of Stomatology, Shandong University

huichen1989313@163.com+86 15562661031

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026