Comparison between radial artery compression hemostasis guided by ultrasonic probe and traditional manual compression hemostasis

Comparison between ultrasound-guided radial artery compression hemostasis and traditional manual compression hemostasis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2100049965

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-08-15

Start date

2021-08-14

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radial artery catheterization and extraction for hemostasis

Interventions

Experimental group (group A) VS control group (group B):Use ultrasonic probe

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

17 Years to 82 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with 22G arterial catheterization for invasive arterial pressure monitoring; Allen test showed negative: the same puncture site was punctured only once; There was no bleeding, hematoma or ecchymosis on the skin at the puncture site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Prior to puncture, there was a history of subcutaneous puncture bleeding or peripheral vascular disease; abnormal platelets; abnormal coagulation function, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Hemostasis of radial artery catheterization and extraction;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactMin Jia

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

candymin66@163.com+86 13970899291

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026