Skip to content

The efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing VS right ventricular septum pacing and right ventricular apical pacing in patients with bradycardia: a prospective cohort study

The efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing VS right ventricular septum pacing and right ventricular apical pacing in patients with bradycardia: a prospective cohort study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100048503
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-07-09
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia

Interventions

Experimental group1:LBBap
Experimental group2:RVSP
Experimental group3:RVAP

Sponsors

Beijing Anzhen Hosptical, Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Severe bradycardia requires the installation of a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker; 2. The proportion of ventricular pacing is more than 40%; 3. Baseline LVEF>50%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable to cooperate with follow-up; 2. Creatinine clearance rate <30ml/min; 3. Late stage of malignant tumor; 4. Pregnant women; 5. Severe valve disease or valve replacement surgery; 6. Permanent atrial fibrillation; 7. The sound window is not good.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Global longitudinal strain;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Brain natriuretic peptide;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWu Yongquan

Beijing Anzhen Hosptical, Capital Medical University

wuyongquan67@163.com+86 13810751596

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026