Skip to content

Comparison and analysis of the efficacy of ciprofol, propofol and etomidate in painless gastroenteroscopy

Comparison and analysis of the efficacy of ciprofol, propofol and etomidate in painless gastroenteroscopy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100048237
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-07-05
Start date
2021-07-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control group:Propofol

Sponsors

Deyang People's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Select ASA I-II patients, aged 18-65 years old, BMI <30kg/m^2; 2. For patients who are going to undergo gastroscopy or colonoscopy, their vital signs are within the requirements of the protocol (HR60-100 beats/min, SBP<160mmHg, DBP<100mmHg), and there is no contraindication to sedation and general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe heart and lung disease, acute perforation of upper gastrointestinal tract, severe snoring or obesity, allergy to anesthesia or sedative drugs, mental disorders, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of anesthesia induction;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Additional medication situation;Waking hours;The incidence of respiratory depression, apnea, and hypoxia;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXia Leqiang

Deyang People's Hospital

649385448@qq.com+86 13547098458

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026