Skip to content

Clinical study of bilateral uterine artery embolization versus surgical resection in the treatment of uterine arteriovenous malformation

Clinical study of bilateral uterine artery embolization versus surgical resection in the treatment of uterine arteriovenous malformation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100048193
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-07-04
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine arteriovenous malformation

Interventions

Experimental group:Uterine arterial embolization

Sponsors

Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with clear diagnosis of UAVM from clinical and imaging data; 2. People at risk of abnormal uterine bleeding or who are bleeding; 3. Clinical conservative treatment failed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Allergic to iodine; 2. Poor coagulation function, INR > 1.5, or undergoing anticoagulant therapy or known hemorrhagic disease; 3. Severe liver and kidney dysfunction (transaminase > 5 times the upper limit of normal, creatinine > 2mg/L); 4. Complicated pregnancy and neoplastic diseases; 5. Comorbidity or social environment that may cause subjects to fail to follow the study plan or even endanger patient safety.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative blood loss;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The operation time;Surgical success rate;Safety evaluation;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactCao Guangshao

Henan Provincial People's Hospital

yajuncao98@126.com+86 15093103069

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026