Skip to content

The Comparation of the Effect of Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent Versus Self-Expanding Vascular Covered Stent in Treatment of Aortoiliac Obstructive Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The Comparation of the Effect of Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent Versus Self-Expanding Vascular Covered Stent in Treatment of Aortoiliac Obstructive Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100046734
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-05-27
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

peripheral arteria disease

Interventions

Control group:Self-expanding stent graft
Experimental group:Ball expanded stent graft

Sponsors

Department of Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The subjects are males or non-pregnant females >= 18 years of age, and their life expectancy is sufficient to complete all the research procedures. 2. Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease with moderate to severe claudication (Rutherford score 2-3 points) or with resting deficiency; bloody painful chronic limb ischemia CLI (Rutherford 4 points) or chronic CLI with ischemic ulcers ( Rutherford score 5-6 points). 3. The target lesion can be successfully passed through the guide wire and can be pre-expanded with a PTA balloon of appropriate size. 4. Diagnosis of patients with primary iliac artery disease (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus, TASC II, TASC II A-D). 5. An informed consent form approved by the ethics committee must be provided.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The subject had previously implanted a vascular graft in the intrinsic iliac blood vessel. 2. The subject has an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) adjacent to the iliac artery target lesion, or the subject has a target iliac artery aneurysm or a target iliac artery perforation or dissection. 3. The subject's serum creatinine is >= 2.5 mg/dl or is on dialysis. 4. The subject is known to be allergic or sensitive to stainless steel (nickel), ePTFE or contrast agents. 5. Subjects are intolerant of antiplatelet, anticoagulant or thrombolytic drugs. 6. The subject has known uncorrectable bleeding factors or active coagulation dysfunction (platelet count <80,000/µL). 7. The subject had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months before the operation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Device and/or Surgical Related Mortality ;All-cause Mortality;Amputation Rate;Acute Limb Ischemia Rate ;Incidence of Cardiovascular Events ;Target Vessel Reconstruction Rate;Phase I Patency Rate;Auxiliary Patency Rate;Phase II Patency Rate;Limp Distance;Creatinine;Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 1- , 6- , 12- , 24- and 36 months post-index procedure;Acute Procedure Success;Acute Lesion Success;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYuan Ding

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

docyuanding@gmail.com+86 18980606344

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026