Ultrasound-guided out-of-plane versus in-plane radial arterial cannulation

Comparison of ultrasound-guided out-of-plane versus in-plane radial arterial cannulation in adult patients

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2100045430

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-04-14

Start date

2021-06-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radial artery puncture technique

Interventions

IN group:US guided in-plane cannulation

OUT group:US guided out-of-plane cannulation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18-90 years; 2. Indications for arterial catheterization ; 3. The patient or guardian agrees to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe clotting dysfunction; 2. The puncture site has hematoma, infection and scar; 3. Patients with endovascular thrombosis or aneurysms before puncture.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Overall success rate;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
First puncture success rate;Secondary puncture success rate;Location time;Puncture time;Complication rate;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWang Xuemin

Shanghai Songjiang District Central Hospital

602336033@qq.com+86 18918285282

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026