Comparative study of two airway management methods in pediatric outpatient dental procedure: laryngeal mask airway versus nasal high-flow oxygen delivery

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2100043269

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2021-02-09

Start date

2021-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric oral disease, general anesthesia, airway management

Interventions

Group LMA:laryngeal mask airway

Group NHF:nasal high-flow oxygen delivery

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children 2 to 7 years old,ASA physical status of I or II,requiring outpatient dental procedure under general anaesthesia and the operation time is expected to thirty minutes to one hour,parents or guardians fully informed and signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known or anticipated difficult bag mask ventilation, known or suspected difficult intubation, oxygen dependence, congenital heart or lung disease, upper airway obstruction, risk of aspiration,obesity (BMI > 30).

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
recovery time;Emergence Agitation;Transcutaneous carbon dioxide;Transcutaneous oxygen saturation;Airway related adverse events;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Complications after general anesthesia;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactRan Longkuan

Stomatology Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

501189@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn+86 13883968276

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026