Skip to content

A comparative study on the efficiency of buccal and palatal implant anchorage assisted distalization of maxillary molars

A comparative study on the efficiency of buccal and palatal implant anchorage assisted distalization of maxillary molars

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2100041843
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-01-07
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Interventions

A:TAD Insert Bucally
B:TAD Insert Palatally

Sponsors

Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 59 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) The patients were over 18 years old, less than 60 years old, healthy in the past, without systemic bone metabolic diseases and other diseases affecting bone metabolism, without systemic systemic systemic diseases; 2) the molar relationship was remote middle relationship (from neutral remote middle to complete remote middle relationship), with mild or moderate crowding of upper dentition or deep overburden of anterior teeth; 3) the third molar existed (designed extraction), extracted or congenital For those who are missing and have enough space for distalization of the second molars, the space can be obtained by distalization of the upper molars (2 to 4 molars on one side or both sides, distalization distance is 1-4mm), which can be used to relieve crowding or improve deep coverage, and improve molar relationship at the same time; 4) the second molars have enough bone mass to implant implant anchorage on the mesiobuccal and palatal side, and receive implantation The patients were treated with implant anchorage; 5) patients without TMJ or TMJ in stable stage (orthodontic treatment can be started after arthroscopy); 6) patients requiring invisible appliance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) The patients with maxillary second molar defect, severe periodontitis, severe crowding, protrusion, etc; 2) Because of severe crowding, protrusion and other reasons, patients need maxillary reduction treatment; 3) Upper dentition defect; 4) Patients with severe periodontitis; 5) Patients with skeletal deformities need orthognathic surgery; 6) patients with impacted teeth except the third molar; 7) patients with progressive temporomandibular joint osteoarthropathy; 8) patients with severe width imbalance of upper and lower dental arch; 9) history of jaw trauma or surgery; 10) systemic diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dental model landmarks;Facial hard tissue landmarks;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactGuangying Song

Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology

songguangying@sina.com+86 13311528361

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026