Skip to content

A comparative study of ZZ with other methods in corneal topography guidance

A comparative study of ZZ with other methods in corneal topography guidance

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000040936
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-12-16
Start date
2020-12-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Interventions

ZZ vs. other methods: ZZ vs. other methods

Sponsors

Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Objective to collect the patients with myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism who voluntarily accepted the assisted personalized guided refractive surgery with automatic positioning tracking system. They were over 18 years old; the diopter was relatively stable; the cornea was transparent and healthy; there was no organic disease in the eye; the refractive medium was transparent and the color vision was normal.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The results showed that the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was less than 1.0.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post astigmatism;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhang Jun

Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital

mskzj@sina.cn+86 18667046602

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026