Skip to content

Intertruncal- versus classical-approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized non-inferiority trial

Intertruncal- versus classical-approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized non-inferiority trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000040199
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-11-25
Start date
2020-11-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper extremity surgery

Interventions

Intertruncal Approach (IA group):Intertruncal approach block
Classical Approach (CA group):Classical approach block

Sponsors

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 122 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III patients, aged 18 to 75 years, presented for surgery of the elbow, forearm, wrist, or hand were enrolled in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refused; Coagulopathy; Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics; Localised infection; Severe liver and kidney dysfunction; Severe pulmonary dysfunction; Mental illness; History of drug abuse; body mass index more than 35kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sensory block;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Motor block;Operation related adverse events;Diaphragmatic paralysis;Duration of sensorimotor block;Anesthesia related indicators;Surgical related indicators;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactGuan Jianqiang

Surgical Anesthesia Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

asguard@qq.com+86 18922103136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026