The auxiliary effects and underlying mechanisms of online self-help mindfulness program on patients with emotional disorders in treatment

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2000039953

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-11-15

Start date

2020-11-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emotional disorders

Interventions

the MIED group:the 49-day online mindfulness program

the TAU-only group:receive treatment as usual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients from 18 to 65 years old; 2. Patients with mood disorders, including anxiety disorders (such as panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder) and unipolar depression, were mild to moderate; 3. Patients who have not changed for at least four weeks before the intervention and are expected to not change during the intervention if they are taking medicine; 4. The subjects who voluntarily joined the study signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects who could not access the Internet; 2. Subjects with insufficient Chinese ability; 3. Subjects who have participated in mindfulness based projects for more than 6 weeks before, and / or the current frequency of meditation practice is more than once a week; 4. Patients with schizophrenia or psychotic affective disorder, current organic mental disorder, substance abuse disorder and generalized developmental disorder; 5. Subjects at risk of suicide.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Beck Depression Inventory-II;Beck Anxiety Inventory;Five-factor Mindfulness Questionnaire;Patient Health Questionnaire-9;Short-Form Health Survey-12;Perceived Stress Scale;10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale;Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale;Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale;Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index;Cognitive–Behavioral avoidance scale;Emotion Regulation Questionnaire;Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview;Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale;Hamilton Depression Rating Scale;	—

Measure

Time frame

Beck Depression Inventory-II;Beck Anxiety Inventory;Five-factor Mindfulness Questionnaire;Patient Health Questionnaire-9;Short-Form Health Survey-12;Perceived Stress Scale;10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale;Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale;Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale;Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index;Cognitive–Behavioral avoidance scale;Emotion Regulation Questionnaire;Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview;Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale;Hamilton Depression Rating Scale;

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
PREMA-Profiler;Chinese version of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory;Rumination and Reflection Questionnaire;Short-Form Self-Compassion Scale;Chinese version of the Distress Tolerance Scale;Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II;costs;Wisconsin Card Sorting Task-64 (WCST);The Visual Stroop task;The Auditory Stroop task;The Ambiguous Scenario Test;The Alternate Uses Task;Revised six-item Practice Quality-Mindfulness (PQ-M), two practice time items;	—

Measure

Time frame

PREMA-Profiler;Chinese version of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory;Rumination and Reflection Questionnaire;Short-Form Self-Compassion Scale;Chinese version of the Distress Tolerance Scale;Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II;costs;Wisconsin Card Sorting Task-64 (WCST);The Visual Stroop task;The Auditory Stroop task;The Ambiguous Scenario Test;The Alternate Uses Task;Revised six-item Practice Quality-Mindfulness (PQ-M), two practice time items;

—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXinghua Liu

Peking University

xinghua_liu@pku.edu.cn+86 10-62756182

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026