FindTrial
Sign In

The effectiveness and safety of Foley's catheter versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour at term: a randomized controlled trial

The effectiveness and safety of Foley's catheter versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour at term: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000038435
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-09-22
Start date
2019-09-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of labour for term singleton

Interventions

Induction of labor with Foley's catheter:Induction of labor with Foley's catheter
IOL with dinoprostone vaginal insert:Induction of labor with dinoprostone vaginal insert

Sponsors

Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women scheduled for IOL; 2. Aged >= 18 years; 3. Gestational age >= 37 weeks; 4. Singleton gestation; 5. Cephalic presentation; 6. Intact membranes; 7. Bishop score < 6; 8. Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindications for vaginal delivery (including placenta previa); 2. Previous caesarean section; 3. Intrauterine fetal death; 4. Nonreassuring fetal heart tracing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
vaginal delivery and time to vaginal delivery;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiaohua Liu

Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

annaabcd114@hotmail.com+86 18916741836

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026