Skip to content

Comparison of Knee Knematics Alterations and Isokinetic Muscle Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Hybrid Graft Versus a Hamstring Autograf

Clinical Outcome Analysis of 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Hybrid Graft Versus a Hamstring Autograf

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000037869
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-09-02
Start date
2020-09-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior cruciate ligament injury

Interventions

8mm Autogenous tendon group, 8mm Mixed tendon group, 9mm Mixed tendon group:Nil

Sponsors

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 52 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury; 2. The patients who had no history of knee surgery; 3. Subjects aged 18 to 45 years old; 4. Those who did not suffer from knee discomfort in the last two months (no swelling, tenderness, locking, limited movement).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with osteoarthritis; 2. Patients with other ligament injuries; 3. Patients with multiple system trauma, nerve injury and fracture; 4. Patients whose clinical data are incomplete and cannot be counted.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
kinematic alterations;isokinetic strength;signal/noise quotient (SNQ);Lysholm knee score;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZeng Chun

Department of Joint Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University

zengdavid@126.com+86 13710760058

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026