Skip to content

Gibson versus Expanded Port Site Incision for Intact Specimen Extraction in Retroperitoneoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Gibson versus Expanded Port Site Incision for Intact Specimen Extraction in Retroperitoneoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000035127
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-08-01
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

renal cancer

Interventions

Gibson group:Intact specimen extraction by Gibson incision
Expanded port site group:Intact specimen extraction by expanded port site incision

Sponsors

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with stage CT1-CT3; 2. Patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy; 3. Body mass index is between 20-28 kg/m2; 4. The age is 18~80 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing open surgery; 2. Patients with venous thrombus; 3. Patients with a history of lumbar or lower abdominal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS pain scale;Incision length;Time to get out of bed;The infection rate was within 3 days after the operation of superficial incision tissue;Incision satisfaction evaluation;The operation time;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHonglin Hu

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

honglinhu@126.com+86 13697919950

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026