FindTrial
Sign In

The influence of different anesthesia methods on maternal outcome after cesarean section: a retrospective study based on medical records

The influence of different anesthesia methods on maternal outcome after cesarean section: a retrospective study based on medical records

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000034779
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-07-18
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Delivery

Interventions

intrathecal block vs general anesthesia:Nil

Sponsors

West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All the postoperative discharge records of patients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital on January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 were collected through the hospital HIS system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anesthesia information is missing or incomplete, disease diagnosis is missing and medical records are incomplete.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative hospitalization days;Whether the newborn was transferred to the NICU;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Risk factors for general anesthesia use;Factors contributing to poor maternal outcomes;Difference in outcome between intra - spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in pregnant women;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHan Huang

Huaxi Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

han.huang@scu.edu.cn+86 13880259786

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026