Skip to content

Retrospective observation study on clinical efficacy of epidural infusion system in treating patients with upper abdominal cancer pain

Retrospective observation study on clinical efficacy of epidural infusion system in treating patients with upper abdominal cancer pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000033982
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-06-20
Start date
2015-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer pain

Interventions

Experimental group:epidural infusion system
Control group:Intravenous analgesic system

Sponsors

Foshan Chancheng central hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We selected 72 patients with upper abdominal cancer pain who were treated in our hospital from August 2015 to August 2018, aged 35 to 75 years, and had a body mass index of 18 to 30 kg/m2. Inclusion criteria: (1) After clinical diagnosis, patients were diagnosed with upper abdominal pain, including 22 patients with gastric cancer, 31 patients with liver cancer, and 19 patients with pancreatic cancer; (2) After three-stage treatment, the effect was not obvious. In the case of no medication, the patient's VAS score is> 7 points, which is refractory pain; (3) the patient is difficult to tolerate traditional treatment; (4) the patient's survival time is more than 3 months; (5) No coagulopathy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with abnormal blood coagulation function; (2) patients with hepatic and renal insufficiency; (3) patients with cardiopulmonary failure; (4) patients with poorly controlled diabetes; (5) patients with surgical site infection; (6) occurrence of puncture site Patients with bone metastases. Randomly divided into a control group and an observation group with 36 patients in each group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in gender, age, height, weight, body mass index and course of disease (P>0.05), which was comparable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS score;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
QOL score;

Contacts

Public ContactHe Meiyi

Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital

sshmy2007@163.com+86 13709293558

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026