Superior component position during robotic-assisted Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with conventional technique: a 5-year follow-up study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2000033918

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-06-16

Start date

2010-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Interventions

ROA group vs COA group:Robotic-assisted surgery vs conventional technique

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Aged 45-75 years; (2) The evaluated ASA physical status between I-III; (3) With normal mobilization before operations; (4) The changes of arthritis below grade III in the femoral-patella compartment and below grade IV in the lateral compartment; (5) BMI <= 30 and the varus degree less than 10 degrees.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Insuffciency of ligament; inflammation-related arthritis; augmentation for the deformity; disorders in neurological movement; pathological status of the contralateral knee, hips, feet, or ankles resulting in obvious gait alteration or pain; those eventually requiring a TKA.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
KSP scores;KSF scores;KSC scores;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhenxiang Zhang

Orthopedic Department, Taizhou People's Hospital

Zhenxiangzhang1982@126.com+86 21 86532798

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026