FindTrial
Sign In

The accuracy of three commonly used indirect bonding methods in clinical practice.

The accuracy of three commonly used indirect bonding methods in clinical practice

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000033223
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-05-24
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

malocclusion

Interventions

Group 1:three-dimensional printing guides
Group 2:double-layer vacuum-form guide plates
Group 3:double-layer polycinyl-siloxane guide plates

Sponsors

Department of Orthodontics, the Airforce Military Medical University, School of Stomatology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
12 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Permanent dentition, unlimited for men and women; 2. The number of teeth that cannot be bonded to the bracket due to crowding, dislocation, congenital missing teeth, eruption and other reasons <= 2; 3. The patient agree to participate in the test and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The upper and lower anterior teeth and premolars have obvious abrasion, defect, large area filling or restoration; 2. Incomplete enamel formation or mineralization; 3. Pregnant and lactating women; 4. With a history of orthodontic treatment;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The accuracy of bracket transferring;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJin Fang

The Airforce Military Medical University, School of Stomatology

fangjin191@163.com+86 13891888191

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026