Skip to content

Efficacy of bone cement/125Iodine seed brachytherapy/radiofrequency/arterial embolism for treating non-spinal bone metastases

Comparison of bone cement/125Iodine seed brachytherapy/radiofrequency/arterial embolism for treating non-spinal bone metastases

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000032667
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Metastasis

Interventions

1:Cement
2:125I brachytherapy
3:Radiofrequency therapy
4:TACE
5:Cement+125I brachytherapy
6:Cement+Radiofrenquency therapy
7:Cement+TACE
8:125I brachytherapy+TACE
9:Radiofrenquency therapy+TACE
10:Cement+125I brachytherapy/radiofrequency therapy/TACE

Sponsors

960th Hospital of PLA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non-spinal bone metastases.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who can not tolerate surgery; 2. Patients who receive other surgical treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain relief;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Survival rate;Immunoreaction;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLi Min

960th Hospital of PLA

liminyingxiang@163.com+86 13953176057

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026