Skip to content

The Prospective Study of The Comparison of The Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression and Open Decompression Fusion and Fixation for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

The Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000031737
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-04-08
Start date
2020-05-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Interventions

Mini-invasive group: Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression Surgery
Open group:Open Decompression Fusion and Fixation Surgery

Sponsors

Peking University Third Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with LSS who have failed regular conservative treatment (mainly with lateral recess type and some unilateral symptoms of central canal type LSS); 2. Patients with adjacent segmental stenosis or stenosis at operation level after lumbar surgery; 3. Responsibility level was <= 2. 4. The patients agree to participate in the study and signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with lumbar disc herniation; 2. Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or obvious mechanical segmental instability; 3. Patients with tumor or infectious lumbar LSS.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS score;ODI score;MacNab score;decompression range;range of motion at operated level;Degeneration of adjacent segments;Demographic data;Surgical data;JOA score;Complications;Satisfied rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLiu Xiaoguang

Peking University Third Hospital

liuxgspine@126.com+86 15201278112

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026