FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative study of the incidence of occlusion in two different types of PICC catheters in outpatients

A comparative study of the incidence of occlusion in two different types of PICC catheters in outpatients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000030971
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-03-20
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PICC

Interventions

Experimental group:Inserting a front-end high-pressure resistant PowerPICC catheter
Control Group:Inserting a three directional valve PICC catheter

Sponsors

Beijing Union Medical College Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing PICC catheterization under ultrasound guidance; 2. Patients who insist on maintenance in our outpatient department once a week; 3. Aged 18 years or over; 4. Patients who can move freely; 5. Patients who can sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The tip of PICC is not located in the middle and lower 1/3 of the superior vena cava 2. Patients with clear evidence of infection before placing the tube; 3. PICC cannot be maintained in our outpatient clinic; 4. Patients with obvious coagulation dysfunction including PLT <100x10^9, PT<10.4s, APTT<22.7s, fibrinogen<1.8/L, thrombin time<14s.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
occlusion;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
bleeding;phlebitis;displacement;thrombus;catheter damage;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactSun Wenyan

Beijing Union Medical College Hospital

s13910108189@126.com+86 13910108189

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026