Study for orotracheal double-lumen endotrachea intubation in patients with a Mallampati score of IlI or 1V: is UE video laryngoscope really better than Macintosh laryngoscope?

The clinical study for orotracheal double-lumen endotrachea intubation in patients with a Mallampati score of IlI or 1V: is UE video laryngoscope really better than Macintosh laryngoscope?

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2000030232

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-02-25

Start date

2020-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

A study on the throat pain after tracheal intubation

Interventions

group A:Tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope

group B:Endotracheal intubation with UE video laryngoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18-70 years old; 2. transthoracic or thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection, lobectomy, bullobectomy; 3. ASA II, III; 4. modified Mallampati Grade III or IV.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Preoperative throat pain or hoarseness; 2. mental illness; 3. airway stenosis or tumor.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Throat pain score;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Success time of endotracheal intubation;Dislocation rate;Cormack Lehane rating;Success rate of single intubation;Hemodynamic fluctuation;Time to correct position;incidence of hoarseness;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXieYanhu

The First Affiliated Hospital of University of science and technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital)

2660747430@qq.com13956013081

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026