Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Techniques in Labor Analgesia

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR2000030045

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-02-21

Start date

2020-02-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor

Interventions

group D:dural puncture

group E:traditional epidural

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

19 Years to 39 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients were aged 19-39 years, with a height of 143-176cm and a body weight of 53-83 kg;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: There were no cerebrospinal fluid reflux and obstruction after lumbar anaesthesia needle puncture, and the epidural catheter insertion was obstruction; and they had contraindications of intraspinal anesthesia, vaginal delivery, and epidural labor analgesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Third-level grade-A hospital;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJiansun

826507703@qq.com+86 15996168372

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026