Skip to content

Comparison of the effect of hydrophilia guide wire versus conventional guide in ercp cannulation

Comparison of the effect of hydrophilia guide wire versus conventional guide in ercp cannulation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2000028984
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-01-10
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ommon bile duct and pancreatic diseases

Interventions

study group:cannulation with hydrophilic guide wire
Control group:Routine guide wire

Sponsors

Huadu District People's Hospitla of Guangzhou
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
24 Years to 92 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants had to meet the inclusion criteria of being older than 18 years, having no variation of biliary anatomy and having not undergone previous Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (EST) surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: undergone previous Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (EST) surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
cannulation time;the frequency of cannulaiton;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJi Tengfei

Huadu District People's Hospitla of Guangzhou

243477587@qq.com+86 15920305292

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026