FindTrial
Sign In

A medical records based study for comparison of the cost–utility of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)and Ultrasound-Guided Local Lauromacrogol Injection Combined with Aspiration for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

A medical records based study for comparison of the cost–utility of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)and Ultrasound-Guided Local Lauromacrogol Injection Combined with Aspiration for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900028195
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-12-15
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Interventions

Case series:no

Sponsors

Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. III Cesarean Scar Pregnancy; 2. an empty uterine cavity without contact with the sac; 3. a clearly visible empty cervical canal without contact with the sac; 4. the presence of the gestational sac in the anterior uterine isthmus with or without a fetal pole or fetal cardiac activity (depending on the gestational age); 5. an absent or diminished myometrial layer between the bladder and the sac.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: without Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)and Ultrasound-Guided Local Lauromacrogol Injection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to b-hCG Normalization;Duration of Hospital Stay;Amount of bleeding (mL);Hospitalization cost (yuan);Complication rate (%);—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWu Qing

Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital

okwq31@163.com+86 15167170568

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026