Skip to content

Overall consistency and safety of capsule endoscopy and conventional gastroscopy in the detection of focal esophageal lesions: a small sample, single-center clinical study

Overall consistency and safety of capsule endoscopy and conventional gastroscopy in the detection of focal esophageal lesions: a small sample, single-center clinical study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900025157
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-08-14
Start date
2019-08-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

esophageal lesions

Interventions

Gold Standard:Conventional Gastroscopy results

Sponsors

West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Subjects voluntarily participate in the study and sign informed consent; 2) Adults aged 18 and above, regardless of gender; 3) In the traditional electronic gastroscopy, the esophageal lesions were found; 4) Meet the indications of capsule endoscopy; 5) Good communication with researchers and compliance with experimental requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) No lesions in esophagus under traditional electronic gastroscopy; 2) No surgical conditions or refuse to accept any abdominal surgery; 3) Various acute enteritis, severe iron deficiency diseases and radioactive enteritis, such as bacterial dysentery, ulcerative colitis acute stage, diverticulitis, etc.; 4) Gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis and fistula are known or suspected; 5) Patients with a history of gastrolithiasis and those who have undergone gastrointestinal surgery in the past three months; 6) Acute stage of upper gastrointestinal perforation; 7) Severe pharyngeal diseases where endoscopy cannot be inserted; 8) Acute stage of erosive esophagitis; 9) Severe dyskinesia, including untreated achalasia of the cardia and gastroparesis; 10) Defecation barrier; 11) Implantation of pacemakers or other electronic devices; 12) Having a history of severe allergy, allergic to anesthetic drugs; 13) Have difficulty swallowing; 14) Pregnant women; 15) Failing to accept the examination requiring barium swallow at least 3 days before the examination; 16) Other inappropriateness of capsule gastroscopy and painless gastroscopy was considered by the investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The positive consistent rate, negative consistent rate and overall consistent rate of esophageal focal lesions detected by the two methods.;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHu Bing

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

hubingnj@163.com+86 18980601278

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026