FindTrial
Sign In

The comparison between suctioning and traditional mini-invasively percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi: a retrospective study

The evaluation of the suctioning mini-invasively percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) compared to traditional MPCNL on the basis of safety and feasibility: a single centre retrospective study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900024543
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-07-15
Start date
2019-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

renal stone

Interventions

Suctioning group :Suctioning sheath during PCNL
Traditional group:Traditional PCNL

Sponsors

Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. paitients with staghorn calculi undergoing MPCNL; 2. aged >=18 year.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 lithotripsy was aborted because of pyonephrosis found in the renal collecting system; 2 anomalous kidneys or a history of open interventions to the ipsilateral kidney; 3 patients undergoing bilateral MPCNL, or MPCNL simultaneously combined with other surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Stone free rate;Complication;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operating time;Hospital length;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChen Hequn

Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

chenhequnxyyy@163.com+86 13908375808

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026