FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of surgical outcomes between video-assisted anal fistula treatment and fistulotomy plus seton for complex anal fistula

Comparison of surgical outcomes between video-assisted anal fistula treatment and fistulotomy plus seton for complex anal fistula

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900024492
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-07-13
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex anal fistula

Interventions

Experimental group:video-assisted anal fistula treatment
Control group:traditional fistulotomy plus seton

Sponsors

Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Consecutive patients with complex anal fistula who received surgical treatment at Yangpu Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. A colonoscopy was also performed to exclude the cases with inflammatory bowel disease; 2. Any active inflammation or abscess was ruled out before surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fistula recurrence;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLiu Hailong

Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

darkknight3000@163.com+86 21 55669260

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026