Comparison of the efficacy of 3D printed percutaneous pedicle guide plate assisted PVP and traditional PVP in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR1900024283

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2019-07-04

Start date

2019-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

vertebra compressed fracture

Interventions

experimental group:3D-printed plate guided PVP

control group:traditional PVP

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

30 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Acute thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures (MRI showed low in T1-weighted and high in T2-weighted or STIR sequence images); 2) Fracture involves <= 3 vertebral bodies; 3) Never perform PVP; 4) Imaging data (including X-ray, MRI/bone scan, CT) is complete; 5) Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Those with evidence of bone tumors and other bone metabolic diseases; 2) CT showed that the posterior wall of the fractured vertebral body is incomplete or ruptured.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
fluoroscopy frequency;operation time;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
VAS;SF-36 ??;complications;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactQi Fei

Beijing Friendship hospital

jack202035@126.com+86 18600840136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026