FindTrial
Sign In

Effects of different anesthesia methods on the prognosis of parturient with pernicious placenta previa undergoing cesarean section

Effects of general anesthesia compare with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on the prognosis of parturient with pernicious placenta previa undergoing cesarean section

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900024247
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-07-02
Start date
2019-08-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pernicious placenta previa

Interventions

Group 1:general anesthesia
Group 2:combined spinal-epidural anesthesia

Sponsors

Xuzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Caesarean section women aged 20-40 years old, BMI <=35kg/m2, diagnosed as pernicious placenta previa.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Less than 34 weeks gestation; 2. Twin or intrauterine distress; 3. Analgesics and sedatives were used before surgery; 4. Parturients are unable to understand various scales; 5. A history of neurological and psychiatric disorders; 6. Prior presence of severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal dysfunction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postpartum comfort;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postpartum recovery quality;ICU admission rate;Intraoperative blood loss;breastfeeding;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactMing Yan

Xuzhou Medical University

yiy3001@163.com+86 18052268329

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026