Skip to content

The effectiveness and safety of transperineal percutaneous laser ablation (TPLA) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): An International multicentre clinical study: compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), randomized, open-label

The effectiveness and safety of transperineal percutaneous laser ablation (TPLA) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): An International multicentre clinical study: compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), randomized, open-label

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900022739
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-04-24
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

benign prostatic hyperplasia

Interventions

1:transperineal percutaneous laser ablation
2:transurethral resection of the prostate, TURP

Sponsors

Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
50 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with LUTS caused by BPH who are ineffective or unsuitable for medical treatment judged by the clinician; (2) Male aged over 50 years; (3) IPSS degree moderate or above; (4) 30ml = the prostate volume measured by TRUS = 100ml; (5) Qmax = 15mL/s; (6) Post-urination residue = 50ml.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Urethral stenosis; (2) Previous prostate, bladder or urethral surgery; (3) Dysuria caused by bladder dysfunction; (4) History of long term indwelling catheter; (5) BPH with mainly medial lobe hyperplasia (Intravesical Prostate Projection = 10mm); Transabdominal bladder ultrasonography revealed bladder calculi or obvious bladder tumor; (6) Prostate cancer patients proved by pathology; PSA > 4ng/ml and PSAD= 0.15 ng/ml2 and exclude the factor of iatrogenic injury; (7) Patients with known neurological disorders, e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons disease, or known history of spinal cord injury; (8) Post rectal surgery or patients with anal atresia; (9) Patients with severe coagulation disorders or with infection; (10) Patients are participating in another clinical study or have been enrolled in another clinical study 4 weeks before randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in IPSS relative to baseline levels at 3 months postoperatively;complication rate within 3 months after surgery ;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Qmax [3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment];Residual urine [3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment];clinically significant post-treatment changes in vital signs (heart rate, respiration, blood pressure), ECG and laboratory tests (liver and kidney function, blood routine) determined by the investigator or his designee;Quality of life score [3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment];European five-dimensional health scale score EQ-5D [3 months, 6 months after treatment];intraoperative blood loss;VAS pain score;postoperative urinary catheter retention time;surgical success rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHu Bing, Fu Qiang

Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

binghu_stephen@163.com+86 18930173507

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026