Skip to content

A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eravacycline Versus Ertapenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (cIAI) in Hospitalized Adults

A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eravacycline Versus Ertapenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (cIAI) in Hospitalized Adults

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900022060
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-03-22
Start date
2019-04-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated intra-abdominal infections

Interventions

Experimental group:Eravacycline 1.0 mg/kg IV q 12h
Control group:Ertapenem 1g IV q 24h

Sponsors

West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female subject hospitalized for cIAI; 2. Aged at least 18 years; 3. Able to provide informed consent; 4. Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response; 5. Abdominal pain or flank pain (with or without rebound tenderness), or pain caused by cIAI that is referred to another anatomic area, or localized or diffuse abdominal wall rigidity, or mass, or ileus; 6. Subjects agree to use a highly reliable method of birth control; 7. For pre-operation enrollment, radiographic imaging results is required which is congruent with diagnosis of cIAI and acute surgical intervention is foreseen within 24h. For intra-operative/post-operative enrollment, visual confirmation of cIAI during an adequate surgical intervention is required, and the subject must receive no more than 1 dose of effective antibacterial drug post-operatively before randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Considered unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period; 2. Creatinine clearance of = 30 mL/min; 3. Presence or possible signs of significant hepatic disease; 4. Immunocompromised condition; 5. History of moderate or severe hypersensitivity reactions to study drug or their similar class of drug; 6. Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to randomization; 7. Known or suspected current central nervous system (CNS) disorder that may predispose to seizures; 8. Antibiotic-related exclusions: a. Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for cIAI > 24h during the 72-h preceding randomization (However, Subjects with known baseline pathogen who are considered treatment failure after at least 72-hour of antibiotic therapy may be enrolled.) OR b. Receipt of study drug or the similar class of drug for the current infection, OR c. Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents other than study drug. 9. Refusal of any resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent; 10. Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess; 11. The anticipated need for systemic antibiotics for a duration of more than 14 days; 12. Systemic malignancy that required antineoplastic therapy within the previous 3 months or that is anticipated to begin prior to the TOC visit; 13. Known at randomization to have cIAI caused by a pathogen(s) resistant to one of the study drugs; 14. Any other unstable or clinically significant concurrent medical condition; 15. Previously received eravacycline treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical efficacy;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Microbiological efficacy;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactKevin Li

EverID Medicines (Beijing) Limited

Kevin.li@everestmedicines.com+86 10 56926015

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026