Skip to content

Comparison of ultrasound–guided deep vein puncture through Two localization method and the traditional method for the learner: A randomized controlled trial

Comparison of ultrasound–guided deep vein puncture through Two localization method and the traditional method for the learner: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900021600
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-02-28
Start date
2019-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

difficult deep vein puncture

Interventions

1:two localization method
2:the traditional method

Sponsors

Fujian Provincial Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing ultrasound-guided deep vein puncture; 2. ASA I or III; 3. BMI 18-25 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Coagulation dysfunction; 2. Skin infection or damage at puncture site; 3. Can't lie down; 4. With intrajugular thrombosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pricked success at first time;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZou Conghua

Fujian Provincial Hospital

nessy_daniel@163.com+86 15280000569

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026