FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the effects of cesarean section and natural delivery on the hemodynamics after birth

Comparison of the effects of cesarean section and natural delivery on the hemodynamics after birth

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1900021358
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-02-17
Start date
2019-02-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

the hemodynamics after birth

Interventions

Two Cohorts:none

Sponsors

West China Second University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: From February 2019 to May 2019, the newborn delivered by cesarean section and natural delivery in our hospital.In addition, there was no deformity, breakage or infection in the skin area where the electrode was needed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Newborn due to their own malformation or suffocation and other special circumstances after the need for rescue, insulation emergency transferred to the neonatal ward.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
hemodynamics;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiaoqin Jiang

West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University

mengmengzhu-521@163.com+86 18180609218

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026