Comparison of the Effects of total intravenous anesthesia and balanced general anesthesia on flash visual evoked potential monitoring

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR1900020773

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2019-01-19

Start date

2019-01-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Diseases

Interventions

B:balanced general anesthesia

T:total intravenous anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18-65 who underwent elective spinal canal surgery under general anesthesia (other electrophysiological monitoring was required at the same time) were selected. ASA I~III, BMI<30kg/cm2, visual function was normal, and informed consent was signed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with visual impairment; Patients with severe liver and kidney disease; Uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, severe arrhythmia or unstable angina; Mentally ill or unable to communicate; Abuse of analgesics and history of drug abuse; Silicone allergy; Reject visual evoked potential monitoring.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Amplitudes of N145-P100;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
latencies of N145-P100;BIS values;Blood pressure;Heart rate;blood loss;hemoglobin;hematocrit;temperature;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHan Ruquan

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University

hanrq666@aliyun.com+86 010-59976660

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026