Skip to content

Spinal versus General Anesthesia for Caesarean Section and Neonatal Noninvasive Hemodynamic Parameters: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Spinal versus General Anesthesia for Caesarean Section and Neonatal Noninvasive Hemodynamic Parameters: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800020313
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-12-23
Start date
2019-01-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Normal single pregnant woman

Interventions

Group 1:lumbar anesthesia

Sponsors

West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: women with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and term singleton pregnancies who were scheduled to undergo elective cesarean delivery for which general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia had been decided on for clinical reasons.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with preexisting or pregnancy-induced hypertension, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, a history of substance abuse, or known fetal abnormalities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
stroke Volume;cardiac output;cardiac index;heart rate;thoracic fluid content ;stroke index;index of contractility;systolic Time Radio;Left Ventricular Ejection Time;stroke volume variation;variation of the index of contractility;Arterial Oxygen Content;oxygen delivery;oxygen delivery index;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiaoqin Jiang

West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University,

1598862657@qq.com+86 18180609218

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026